Picture
Lower earnings for tankers that carry energy products are sparking concern about possible cuts in spending on maintenance and crews, according to an industry group representing companies including BP Plc.“We’re beginning to see the start of a trend,” David Cotterell, director of the London-based Oil Companies International Marine Forum, said by phone today. Four “serious” tanker fires took place in the first quarter, resulting in the loss of 15 lives, he said separately by e-mail.

“It’s a big concern and something that we’ll continue to watch very closely,” Cotterell said. “We’ve seen from previous downturns that one of the things that happens quickly is the need to reduce costs on vessels. One of the ways to reduce costs on vessels is crews and also on maintenance.”

Rates for the largest oil tankers fell to the lowest level in 14 years in 2011 amid a glut of vessels and slowing global crude demand. Earnings for five types of oil-product and crude tankers on 16 routes were below break-even levels on average in the last year, data from shipbroker Poten & Partners Inc. and investment bank Pareto Securities ASA show.Forum members transport 95 percent of all oil carried by sea, according to Cotterell. The group’s membership includes the shipping arms of BP and Royal Dutch Shell Plc, the world’s two biggest charterers of tankers, its website shows.

Reduced returns over the past two years are affecting maintenance, Craig Stevenson Jr., chief executive officer of Diamond S Shipping, said in an interview March 22. The poor condition of some vessels offered for distressed sale by banks was evident in potential purchases assessed by the Greenwich, Connecticut-based owner of 40 tankers, he said.“There’s been a good two years of really poor economic environment in shipping,” Stevenson said. “What do you think happens to maintenance? It stops.”

Source: Bloomberg
 


Comments

Chris Allport
09/04/2012 11:37am

Tanker operators should take note of OCIMF’s concerns. Their comments are a signal to industry to maintain their crewing and maintenance standards through the market downturn. Operators that fail to take notice and reduce standards as a means to lower their costs will find it has a negative effect on their long-term commercial opportunities. This negative impact on their commercial opportunities may persist long after the market recovers, as oil major vetting departments have long memories, and operators that drop their standards will then have to regain the confidence of their potential charterers, and this may take several years of flawless operations.
Oil major and other vetting systems are designed to quickly indicate where standards are deteriorating and those companies’ vessels will not get hired – regardless of cost. Only those vessels that pass the vetting processes will be considered for charter – it is not a question of the “cheapest”, rather than the lowest cost vessel that meets the charterers’ quality assurance criteria. Lagging indicators such as SIRE, CDI or Port State inspections and incident frequency will soon demonstrate to the vetting department that the operators’ TMSA leading indicator is deteriorating and falling below their minimum threshold for charter. Smart operators will not cut costs by dropping their crewing and maintenance standards; they will save on costs by becoming more efficient overall, particularly in their costly shore organizations and have effective means to weather this downturn.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply